Ontology Analysis Report
Ontology Information
File:
ontology_contract.owl
IRI:
Not available
Ontology Statistics
11
Classes
5
Object Properties
0
Data Properties
0
Individuals
Consistency Check
ConsistentReasoning Methodology
Reasoners Used:
- Pellet
Reasoning Tasks:
- Consistency
- Classification
- Realization
Theoretical Guarantees:
Property | Status |
---|---|
Decidability | Decidable for OWL DL ontologies |
Completeness | Complete for SROIQ(D) description logic |
Soundness | Sound for standard description logics |
Limitations:
- May time out on very large ontologies
- OWL Full constructs not supported
- Resolution is limited to standard tableaux algorithm capabilities
Performance:
Reasoning Time: 2121 ms
Start Time: 2025-06-06T20:23:00.278950
End Time: 2025-06-06T20:23:02.399869
Axioms
Type | Description |
---|---|
SubClassOf | Contract ⊑ Thing |
SubClassOf | Consideration ⊑ Thing |
SubClassOf | ContractFormation ⊑ Thing |
SubClassOf | DisputeResolution ⊑ Thing |
SubClassOf | Party ⊑ Thing |
SubClassOf | Right ⊑ Thing |
SubClassOf | Clause ⊑ Thing |
SubClassOf | MeetingOfTheMinds ⊑ Thing |
SubClassOf | Obligation ⊑ Thing |
SubClassOf | Performance ⊑ Thing |
SubClassOf | Breach ⊑ Thing |
Type | Description |
---|---|
SubClassOf | Contract ⊑ Thing |
SubClassOf | Consideration ⊑ Thing |
SubClassOf | ContractFormation ⊑ Thing |
SubClassOf | DisputeResolution ⊑ Thing |
SubClassOf | Party ⊑ Thing |
SubClassOf | Right ⊑ Thing |
SubClassOf | Clause ⊑ Thing |
SubClassOf | MeetingOfTheMinds ⊑ Thing |
SubClassOf | Obligation ⊑ Thing |
SubClassOf | Performance ⊑ Thing |
SubClassOf | Breach ⊑ Thing |
Type | Description |
---|
Type | Description |
---|
Inferred Axioms
Type | Description |
---|---|
No inferred axioms available |
Derivation Trace
This visualization shows how inferences were derived during reasoning:
- No inferences were made during reasoning
- The ontology was analyzed using a method that doesn't track derivations
- The reasoner encountered an error during the inference process
First-Order Logic Premises
The following FOL premises have been generated from the ontology axioms:
Type | FOL Formula | Description |
---|---|---|
class | instance_of(x, Contract, t) |
Entities that are instances of Contract |
class | instance_of(x, Consideration, t) |
Entities that are instances of Consideration |
class | instance_of(x, ContractFormation, t) |
Entities that are instances of ContractFormation |
class | instance_of(x, DisputeResolution, t) |
Entities that are instances of DisputeResolution |
class | instance_of(x, Party, t) |
Entities that are instances of Party |
class | instance_of(x, Right, t) |
Entities that are instances of Right |
class | instance_of(x, Clause, t) |
Entities that are instances of Clause |
class | instance_of(x, MeetingOfTheMinds, t) |
Entities that are instances of MeetingOfTheMinds |
class | instance_of(x, Obligation, t) |
Entities that are instances of Obligation |
class | instance_of(x, Performance, t) |
Entities that are instances of Performance |
class | instance_of(x, Breach, t) |
Entities that are instances of Breach |
property | hasPart(x, y, t) |
Relation hasPart between entities |
property | involves(x, y, t) |
Relation involves between entities |
property | specifies(x, y, t) |
Relation specifies between entities |
property | requires(x, y, t) |
Relation requires between entities |
property | resultsIn(x, y, t) |
Relation resultsIn between entities |
Ontology Entities
- Performance
- Consideration
- DisputeResolution
- MeetingOfTheMinds
- Contract
- Breach
- Obligation
- Clause
- Party
- Right
- ContractFormation
- hasPart
- involves
- specifies
- requires
- resultsIn
Discover Real-World Implications
Generate concrete real-world examples that demonstrate how your ontology's logical rules apply in practical situations.
Using AI, we'll analyze your ontology's First-Order Logic premises and create meaningful scenarios that illustrate the implications of your ontological structures.